Thanks Danielle - I think an important context for your overall work is that we know there are disparities by race/ethnicity and SES in STIs, as well as in tubal infertility that results from STIs. So your second generation work, assuming it is done in populations representing women of color and of lower SES (which I know it is), has the ability to help uncover pathways by which these populations are particularly impacted, and opportunities for better helping optimize health outcomes. And you know I love your focus on women's own preferences and experiences! This is of course important in all areas of health, but in reproductive health ahs particular salience.
As I have said to others, I agree that work in reproductive health is a particularly important place to apply the place-based, social communication approach that the barbershop intervention employed. We are currently doing an intervention designed to facilitate peer to peer communication among adolescents about long acting contraception, motivated by the belief that in reproductive health these one to one type exchanges from trusted peers are in fact more powerful than a more public or group setting, given the subject matter. This may be applicable to your area as well.