Hi.
Myself and several of my classmates are confused by question 1C:
"C. Although these data are not provided in the paper, assume that in both randomization groups, the 5-year survival of those whose tumor size was < 1 cm at the time of diagnosis was longer than those whose tumor was ≥ 2 cm at the time of diagnosis.
Could this difference in survival by tumor size at diagnosis be at least partly due to lead time bias? Explain. [2]"When the question asks about "difference in survival," is it asking about difference in survival between < 1cm and ≥ 2 cm tumors? Or is it asking about "difference in survival" BETWEEN intervention and control groups, assuming the intervention group was more often diagnosed with <1cm tumors because they received specific instruction on BSE versus the control group, which presumably presented with ≥2cm tumors more often because they weren't instructed on BSE? Or were these "differences in survival" both present equally(?) in the intervention and control groups because we are assuming this "in both randomization groups"?
Thanks.