- A. What evidence are you proposing to translate into practice?
Libya, one of the developing countries, lacks sufficient well-organized cervical screening programs. Pap smear has been used as a diagnostic test for the symptomatic women who most likely were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma.
In addition, the Libyan women are not aware about the cervical cancer and the effectiveness of Pap smear to diagnose the early stages of the neoplastic changes
I propose that face-to-face education by health care providers is an effective interventions aimed at women to encourage the uptake of cervical cancer screening
- Justify that this evidence is “ready for translation.”
Cochrane review was last updated in 2011, the eligible RCT studies support the use of invitation letters and/or telephone calls for increasing the uptake of Pap smears as a screening tool. There was strong evidence to suggest that face-to-face education may also increase Pap smear uptake. 1
- Identify a single, key behavior change target for your translational activity.
I think there are two key behavior changes:
- Health providers: spend time to educate their female patients about the cervical cancer screen as a secondary prevention method.
- Target Women: encourage the woman at risk (every sexually active woman ) to have the Cervical cytology (Pap smear ) least once in their lifetime.
- Conduct a “gap analysis” of your target behavior. Look to diverse sources for “best guess” estimates if specific measures are not available.
The effective cervical cancer screen shows that 70%–80% women at risk should be screened once every five years, or at least once in their lifetime. Besides, all test-positive cases must receive treatment.2
The screening program needs to be sustainable. Otherwise, the screening program would not effective to decrease incidence of cervical cancer in the future
- B. What is the quality (performance) gap?
There is no specific data but there is no national screening programs, and the majority of Pap smear done as a diagnostic test
- C. What is the outcome gap?
- Missing the early stage of the precancerous changes treatable,
- High morbidity and mortality form late detection of incisive cancer
D. Is there evidence that changing performance will improve health (clinical outcomes)?
There is strong evidence that increase uptake cervical cancer screen helps reduce cervical carcinoma incidence and associated morbidity and mortality.
References:
1- Everett T, Bryant A, Griffin MF, Martin-Hirsch PPL, Forbes CA, Jepson RG. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD002834. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub2.
2- Chumworathayi B. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening: RHL commentary (last revised: 1 November 2012). The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization.