I watched the old lecture and read the required reading article, but I'm still not sure if I'm on track here with answering these questions. Here's my attempt, definitely open to feedback or can revise if I've missed the content of course material:
- What level of government did you target to translate your research into policy and why did this make the most sense? I have not yet targeted a level of government to translate my research, as my project is a gap analysis looking at facilitators and barriers to the provision of reproductive healthcare for female adolescents with rheumatic diseases taking teratogenic medications. Effective solutions to this problem have not yet been described or tested.
- What level of government makes the most sense for you to translate your research into policy and why? Same as above - and the article and lecture didn't really go through different levels of government (perhaps I am missing something?)
- What strategies did you use to reach policymakers? I have not yet done this, but based on strategies highlighted in the reading, in thinking about future dissemination:
-
- Data for policymaking must be locally relevant (My study is limited to healthcare providers (pediatric rheumatologists and PCPs) in Northern California) - I don't know what voting districts or precinct levels, though.
- Develop a short policy summary, include narrative storytelling
- Actively lobby on behalf of particular issue (prioritize and reimburse provision of reproductive healthcare for female patients with rheumatic conditions (or all conditions) taking teratogenic medications.
- What steps are available to you to reach policymakers?
- Educate legislative staff members on public health issues (they are the gatekeepers)
- Cultivate a political champion