Charles' comments/questions

Charles' comments/questions

by Charles Fleischmann -
Number of replies: 1

Question: Notestein's Motives: I'm curious to know what people think of Notestein's motives in specifically advocating for birth control in developing countries for much of his career. Szreter writes "As much as I can tell from his writings, the ultimate justification for this was partly a balanced estimate of America's long-term economic and geopolitical interests and partly purely humanitarian considerations." (689) Which justification was more important for Notestein? 


Comment: It seems that contemporary population concerns all have to do with population decline. I.e. declining birthrates warn of a situation in which a relative abundance of old people in society imposes a large economic burden. This clearly differs from the state of "low pressure equilibrium" that was the supposed end state of Demographic Transition Theory. 

In reply to Charles Fleischmann

Charles' comments/questions

by Carolyn Hughes -
Interesting question on Notestein's motives! It feels like Notestein's justification around humanitarianism was more important to him, at least in his own retrospective discussion around it. Szreter mentions how Notestein talked about his experience with a "peasant village" in China, and how the people there wanted the ability to control their fertility. However, we have no idea who the questions were asked of these people and whether Notestein is interpreting the interaction through the lens that he, himself wanted to interpret it. Either way, the response reinforced his methodologies and ideas. Notestein seemed to see his own work in supporting family planning efforts through the demographic transition theory, and then as a circular way to then justify that it helped others meet their needs. However, at the time global development was still so new, run almost entirely by white men in high-income settings, and suffered from (and still does in many areas) a god complex. I think that economic and geopolitical interests were the more dominant driver and motivation, but humanitarian justification was the better rationale and cover story for Notestein.