Carolyn's comments

Carolyn's comments

by Carolyn Hughes -
Number of replies: 1

From the Christensen paper, it was great to read a synthesis of information on how the aging process, morbidity, disability, and mortality has changed in the past couple of centuries in developed countries. I was waiting, however, for an actual paragraph/section that assessed mental health as its own category. Mental health, depression, and “psychological” distress/symptoms/autonomy are each mentioned, but only within the context of other issues/challenges/consequences. I was a little surprised by this, considering the fact that mental illness is a major source of lost productivity and years of life lived with disability. It would be interesting to see the topic covered on its own in this sort of discussion, potentially after the paragraph about disability. From what I recall, the prevalence of several mental illnesses, like depression, are increasing and starting earlier in life, and many of these conditions can be chronic. The authors mention very briefly that depression prevalence is decreasing, though that was in the Netherlands, and other countries may have differing data. 

It was also surprising to see that, as people get into very old age, women tend to have higher levels of “functional limitations” than men, and that this “male advantage” seems to be pretty consistent at the oldest ages. I wonder if this is in part due to musculoskeletal issues and osteoporosis? We generally think of women has having the health advantage, so it was interesting to see this occurring, and maybe as everyone lives longer, it looks like that advantage may even out.

I was also left wondering how climate change may impact health and wellbeing. It’s outside the scope of the Christensen article, but it may make for an interesting follow-up. 


From the Preston paper, I would have liked to have seen a little more information on how the death rate estimation was done for the BMI categories. While their analysis seems totally legit, I’m curious if any adjustment was made for modifications in the risk of death associated with treatment of conditions that are associated with a higher risk of death among those with higher BMI. For example, treatment of diabetes, use of antihypertensive medications, and use of cholesterol-lowering drugs have all been associated with lower mortality. I would think that outcomes for conditions with modifiable risks now may be better than they were in the time period that the data were originally collected, so it would be interesting to see if the projections take this into account. (I think this is part of what Christensen notes.)


In reply to Carolyn Hughes

Re: Carolyn's comments

by Richard Hu -
I'm glad you brought up the point about mental health in the Christensen article, because when it opened with a discussion of Japan's life expectancy and mortality, my mind went first to Japanese healthcare and diet, and second to Japan's high suicide rate. East Asian countries are pretty notorious for the cutthroat environment surrounding salaried life, and I know this has negative effects of mental health. Apparently, the few studies that had been conducted on cognition and dementia in the U.S. had conflicting results, although one study found the prevalence of dementia in Japan had increased. For Japan, ADL was used as a measure of disability which decreased, but the examples given were practically all physical activities. Another thing to note is that, from what I've heard and read, contrary to the West in which mental health is becoming a topic of open discussion, insinuating that someone (much less oneself) has mental health issues in the East is still quite taboo.