I really enjoyed reading and discussing Raskind’s (2018) article that stated that prazosin was not effective in treating nightmares for veterans. My initial reaction was a bit of shock, as I had always associated prazosin with being effective for nightmares. To be honest, I considered it to be a staple in clinical practice, although this was not rooted in my own research on the topic.
What struck me most about our discussion was the importance of reading and dissecting literature with a critical eye. One might read this article, published in the highly esteemed New England Journal of Medicine, and re-think his or her own clinical practice due to the results and findings that prazosin is not efficacious in treating nightmares within PTSD, compared to placebo. However, it is crucial to remember that the study only studied military veterans, thereby limiting the external validity of the study to all people with PTSD. Secondly, the study used predominantly male participants, also limiting the generalizability of the study to female veterans (let alone, females with PTSD). Thus, it was an important lesson in being very critical of the study design (in this case, who is being studied) and assessing if the results of the study are generalizable to your population of interest.
Raskind, M. A., Peskind, E. R., Chow, B., Harris, C., Davis-Karim, A., Holmes, H. A., ... & Romesser, J. (2018). Trial of Prazosin for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Military Veterans. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(6), 507-517.