Sauceda_HMWK 1

Sauceda_HMWK 1

by John Sauceda -
Number of replies: 3

Topic: Addressing the mental health of people living with HIV as a means to optimize HIV treatment.

Background: Globally, mental health and neurological disorders continue to count as a top-five risk factor for disability and mortality. In people living with HIV (PLWH), the most rigorous and nationally representative study to date found that up to 48% of PLWH met criteria for a depressive or anxiety disorder and/or were using illicit drugs or engaging in problematic drinking. Mental health problems and substance use directly impact the management of HIV and clinical outcomes.

Intervention: Successful management of HIV and prevention of forward transmission requires the achievement of viral suppression via good antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. But high-quality meta-analytic data show ART adherence is impaired by psychological disorders that either diminish motivation for self-care or lead to forgetfulness. An abundance of evidence shows the efficacy of HIV adherence-promoting and treatment interventions for mental health and HIV adherence issues simultaneously. Advancements in new ART and improvements in the epidemic as a whole have not led to better mental health or reductions in the prevalence of substance use. It remains a challenge to treat ongoing mental health problems that affect over 1 in 3 PLWH.         

Solution: Brief and adaptable interventions to treat mental health problems and promote adherence have been studied in HIV care, but have not been adopted or fully integrated. Multisite trials of integrated treatment for depression within primary care show faster times to first mental health care visit, greater number of visits and better appointment attendance. One solution is to identify the reasons why the adherence-promoting interventions are not better integrated within HIV care settings given the burden of the problem, and the because there are clear, low-cost and readily available interventions for problems of medication and appointment attendance.  

Utilization: Many people living with HIV engage in HIV care well, but severely underutilize psychological treatment services. A key challenge is harness the infrastructure and resources given to HIV care to also address mental health problems that directly impede on the management of the disease. Further, another challenge is identifying personnel who can accurately screening and diagnose patients for psychological disorders, and the logistics of a streamlined “hand off” from providers to interventionist/therapist.

Benefits: There is both benefits in terms of reductions in rates of suicide, and greater disability adjusted life years gained. Further, the “treatment as prevention strategy” as a national organizing effort only succeeds when PLWH achieve viral suppression. The PLWH who are least likely to achieve viral suppression are those struggling with mental health and problematic substance use.  


In reply to John Sauceda

Re: Sauceda_HMWK 1

by Lea Vella -

Great topic!!  It would be interesting to get a better picture of where most ART care is delivered (pleas forgive my ignorance). Is the majority delivered in primary care or ID clinics? Are you interested in US or global care settings?   While there is a push toward integrated mental health in US primary care and some specialty clinics, it is often more of a co-located model, with similar problems to access as traditional mental health specialty services. There is a lot of good evidence out there for integrated models of mental health care, but they also have their own implementation issues!  I am looking forward to seeing where your project goes. 

In reply to John Sauceda

Re: Sauceda_HMWK 1

by Timothy -

Hi John,

A very interesting topic - can you be more specific about what "brief and adaptable interventions to treat mental health problems" you envision implementing? Is this an issue of screening? Access to resources? Stigma? Are there evidence-based interventions addressing MH that have been implemented successfully in related disciplines or settings (i.e.primary care) that might be adapted to HIV care?


Tim

In reply to John Sauceda

Re: Sauceda_HMWK 1

by Elvin -

Nice topic.  You can conceptualize the gap in this case, it seems to me, either as one related to HIV or one related strictly to depression.  Addressing depression will have multiple layers of benefits, but important to pick one (at least for the moment) to focus in on.