#5 Tool – Post-Op Debrief Audit Cards
A. Describe one tool that you will employ in your intervention strategy using the following domains....
- Tool—type: Debrief Audit Cards
- Target Population: Circulating Nurses
- Target Behavior: Performing Debrief on all neurosurgical cases
- PRECEDE Category: Reinforcing
- Platform: Initially paper cards with all neurosurgical case charts until process refined, then once ready for all UCSF services, built as OR template in APeX. Systems/efficiency concerns documented on same paper audit card initially, with goal of documenting in separate protected electronic system that automatically messages appropriate departments (e.g. rounding mobile software)
B. For a multi-tool intervention strategy, use the PER worksheet attached to describe how you will address each of the PRECEDE framework components
PER Worksheet.
PER Worksheet.
|
Target Behavior |
Performing the Post-Op debrief on all neurosurgical cases |
|
|
Target Audience |
Attending surgeons |
|
|
Other Key Individuals |
Resident surgeons, attending and resident anesthesiologists, crani and spine pod nurses, pre-op team, nursing QI, nursing pod managers, Chair of Neurosurgery, Chair of Anesthesiology, neurosurgery quality team, healthcare services researcher |
|
|
PREDISPOSING |
ENABLING |
REINFORCING |
|
KNOW |
BE ABLE TO DO (skills) |
REMINDED |
|
Post-operative debriefs prevent rare but serious events |
Understand all debrief items (e.g. do all surgeons know what all “wound classifications” are) |
Fliers in meeting rooms about policy change |
|
Systems issues in the ORs are not clearly defined |
Create culture of team communication |
Fliers at OR Front Desk about completing audit cards |
|
Debriefs are rolling out system-wide soon. Time to refine process and make it work |
Create system for tracking efficiency problems; paper first with goal of creating electronic system |
Email from Chair to attendings and residents regarding policy change |
|
|
Change pre-op behavior to remember a debrief audit card on all neurosurgical case charts |
Compliance data reported to Neurosurgical Chair who will communicate to attendings as needed |
|
|
|
Presentation at institutional meetings, grand rounds, staff meetings |
|
BELIEVE/VALUE |
ACCESS TO |
POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT |
|
Defining systems problems will lead to actual systems change |
Debrief audit cards and box for collection of completed cards |
Attending performance will be reported and compared to colleagues |
|
Input of all surgical team members; improved team communication |
Time (1-4 minutes) at end of case for all team members to stop and communicate |
Compliance with performing debrief compared to case load reported back to surgical teams – set targets |
|
Attending and resident surgeons will be responsible for championing the effort |
Time for circulating nurse to complete audit card |
Neurosurgical resident QI goal for FY15; compliance tied to incentive |
|
Debriefs will reduce delays |
QI staff time to document and triage all identified efficiency problems |
|
|
That nurses will not be the OR police |
|
|
|
All feedback welcomed without retribution |
|
|
|
INTENTION |
ACCESS REMOVED |
NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT |
|
To perform the debrief on all neurosurgical cases |
|
Attending performance will be reported and compared to colleagues |
|
To document all debriefs on the audit cards |
|
OR reports cannot be signed off without confirmed performance of debrief (potential downstream) |
|
To document efficiency problems on all cases |
|
SOCIAL SUPPORT |
|
To identify and resolve efficiency problems, and communicate back to surgical teams |
|
Advisory committee with key stakeholders |
|
OTHER |
|
Space for nurses to voice concerns confidentially |
|
|
|
|